We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2173
Description[?]:
RECOGNISING that private companies do not have the interests of Likatonia at heart RECOGNISING that many companies are keen to outsource jobs to economies that operate slave wage labour REALIZING that only nationalized control of key economic functions can guarentee jobs and wages for Likatonias PROPOSING that the government assumes control of key areas of economic output, specifically those linked to the provision of basic necessities in life. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Current: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Proposed: All power stations are publicly owned.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Current: Each region owns and maintains its own power grid.
Proposed: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:52:02, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill |
Message | Same as before, pushed to the fore again, it may pass this side of the last election |
Date | 22:24:30, January 17, 2006 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill |
Message | And again, no. There is no reason to remove the private sector involvement in the production of energy. None of the dire predictions made during the debate which led to partial privatization have come to pass; and power costs have dropped for all citizens due to the competation between public and private plants. |
Date | 04:44:05, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill |
Message | This would create a monopoly and allow for massive gauging at the state's 'discretion'. It is healthier for the economy to leave it regulated but in the hands of the private sector. |
Date | 12:46:08, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill |
Message | We demand that the SLP remove socialist from your name, otherwise we shall go round with a banner proclaiming the SLP to be hypocrites. |
Date | 23:49:59, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill |
Message | The AAS supports, completely. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 207 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 293 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: "There are people in the world so hungry that God cannot appear to them except in the form of bread." - Mahatma Gandhi |