Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 00:25:58
Server time: 23:34:01, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Dx6743 | JourneyJak | Paulo Nogueira | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2173

Description[?]:

RECOGNISING that private companies do not have the interests of Likatonia at heart

RECOGNISING that many companies are keen to outsource jobs to economies that operate slave wage labour

REALIZING that only nationalized control of key economic functions can guarentee jobs and wages for Likatonias

PROPOSING that the government assumes control of key areas of economic output, specifically those linked to the provision of basic necessities in life.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:52:02, January 17, 2006 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill
MessageSame as before, pushed to the fore again, it may pass this side of the last election

Date22:24:30, January 17, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill
MessageAnd again, no. There is no reason to remove the private sector involvement in the production of energy. None of the dire predictions made during the debate which led to partial privatization have come to pass; and power costs have dropped for all citizens due to the competation between public and private plants.

Date04:44:05, January 18, 2006 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill
MessageThis would create a monopoly and allow for massive gauging at the state's 'discretion'.

It is healthier for the economy to leave it regulated but in the hands of the private sector.

Date12:46:08, January 18, 2006 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill
MessageWe demand that the SLP remove socialist from your name, otherwise we shall go round with a banner proclaiming the SLP to be hypocrites.

Date23:49:59, January 18, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the ISM Nationalisation of Energy Production Bill
MessageThe AAS supports, completely.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 207

no
       

Total Seats: 293

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

    Random quote: "There are people in the world so hungry that God cannot appear to them except in the form of bread." - Mahatma Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66