We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military & Foreign Policy Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: RISE Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3960
Description[?]:
| The DUPs reforms to Military & Foreign Policy, we hope you take these into consideration before voting. The reasons for these are: Article 1: Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombings. I think this should be changed as we cannot risk the lives of citizens. We should provide this change as nuclear attacks, bombings ect is a bad enough situation without our government being criticised by other countries for not providing shelter. Article 2: The government's policy regarding foreign embassies. This should be changed as we should not let other countries place embassies if we are not in any conflict ourselves. Don't let us be dragged into wars! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: The government does not allow foreign embassies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:19:46, December 29, 2015 CET | From |  Solentia National Congress (SNC) | To | Debating the Military & Foreign Policy Reforms |
| Message | The Solentia National Congress (SNC) can support the first article but not the second article. |
| Date | 23:55:39, December 29, 2015 CET | From | RISE Movement | To | Debating the Military & Foreign Policy Reforms |
| Message | Maybe splitting the 2 would be better? What does other parties think? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 182 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 243 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
| Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx |