Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 01:45:35
Server time: 02:14:24, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Higher Education Tuition Act 2172

Details

Submitted by[?]: Centre Démocratique

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2173

Description[?]:

To promote greater access to higher education among people of all income levels.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:28:03, January 19, 2006 CET
From Dynex Party
ToDebating the Higher Education Tuition Act 2172
MessageDynex Party supports this and believes it is an important step in educating our society. We believe that further educational subsidies should be put in place eventualls

Date02:28:08, January 19, 2006 CET
From Dynex Party
ToDebating the Higher Education Tuition Act 2172
MessageDynex Party supports this and believes it is an important step in educating our society. We believe that further educational subsidies should be put in place eventually.

Date13:30:23, January 19, 2006 CET
From Ultimate Freedom Party
ToDebating the Higher Education Tuition Act 2172
MessageDouble post, but the Ultimate Freedom Party supports this as well. Education should be available to all, as that will make our country more prosperous in the long term.

Date16:54:14, January 20, 2006 CET
From Omega Party
ToDebating the Higher Education Tuition Act 2172
Messagethe rich can afford tuition, they do not need to be supported further by the government

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 501

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "Isn't it about time that the US government stop supporting dictatorships and avaricious oligarchies with our tax monies, munitions, and diplomacy?" - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 55