Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 01:37:11
Server time: 10:22:48, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | burgerboys | itsjustgav | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of July 3962

Details

Submitted by[?]: Choice

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3963

Description[?]:

It appears to us that no party currently has proposed a proper budget to proper address the debt issues we are currently in. Although taxes do need updating, we believe a more sensible budget is required. For a start, head of government doesn't particularly require such vast funding and defence was rather overfunded. We believe our proposed changed overall should not cause harm to the vulnerable in our society too much.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:48:12, January 03, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 3962
MessageMr Speaker

This is the Budget of the Opposition and we will of course vote against it. And we really criticize the the cuts in the Ministry of Internal Affairs as well as Ministry of Defence.

I yield.

Date21:51:22, January 03, 2016 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 3962
MessageMr Speaker

It is irrational to vote against a budget proposal because the opposition proposed it! If it's a budget that works, then it shouldn't matter who proposed it. As for criticism regarding the internal affairs and defence budgets, Internal Affairs only had very minor cuts in our proposal, and defence was rather overfunded, we are not even at serious war! Our civilians and people come first.

Jason Chandler
Leader of New Choice

Date21:56:25, January 03, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 3962
MessageMr Speaker

It is a common parliamentary procedure that HM's Government lays an own Budget and HM's Opposition, if possible, unites around an own "shadow" budget, or what you may call it. The Liberal Alliance awaits the Ministry of Finance's Cabinet Budget.

I yield.

Date22:09:21, January 03, 2016 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 3962
MessageMr Speaker

We care not for feeble traditions, this procedure hinders progress and in turn hurts the nation!

Jason Chandler
Leader of New Choice

Date22:35:45, January 03, 2016 CET
FromUnited Luthori
ToDebating the Budget proposal of July 3962
MessageMr. Speaker,

Unsurprisingly, New Choice has a complete disregard for procedures, customs, the monarchy, everything Luthorian, etc. etc. etc. Now on to the budget, I must say it's absolutely disgraceful to be cutting so many vital ministries. This isn't a time for austerity, it is a time for new government involvement in the economy. We need more investment, not more austerity!

Emily Buckley MD
Leader of the HDU

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 27

no
      

Total Seats: 418

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

    Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54