Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 02:22:07
Server time: 09:37:52, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): aai14 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Local Exchange Act of July 3963

Details

Submitted by[?]: Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3964

Description[?]:

Locals deserve local leadership, local decisions and local democracy - all at a local level. This act aims to give them just one piece of the pie of freedom. The freedom to choose, the freedom to say no, yes or maybe, the freedom to determine their own destinies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:42:17, January 06, 2016 CET
FromGreen Party
ToDebating the Local Exchange Act of July 3963
MessageWhile I understand a certain amount of powers should be left to the locals, a national stock exchange that is regulated by the national government is necessary for a productive trading environment. Otherwise, traders would have to wrestle with different regulations in different states.

Date02:02:42, January 06, 2016 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the Local Exchange Act of July 3963
MessageSo, that would only affect the states that wish to impose that kind of regulation, what gives?

Date03:02:58, January 06, 2016 CET
FromGreen Party
ToDebating the Local Exchange Act of July 3963
MessageI don't think you understand, every state would have to have its own trading market and each state would have to regulate its own market independently which is simply ridiculous. This is not even a case of state's rights, this is simple economic common sense. There is absolutely no reason to decentralize the stock market. Other policies, I can understand the arguments for, but this is simply ridiculous. The stock market has a massive influence on the national economy and thus should remain a national organization.

Date09:28:04, January 06, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Local Exchange Act of July 3963
MessageActually, we will reverse our vote. We prefer a freer market without any regulation.

Date09:40:56, January 06, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Local Exchange Act of July 3963
MessageMr Speaker,

I would like to ask the Green Party to give me a more detailed description on why our party should vote either Yes or No on this bill. At the moment, our party is confused over whether by voting No on this, it will make our stance on the market in support of more regulation. We would also like to ask the Confederate Party what the benefit of this bill is. Thank you very much and we yield the floor to the cat under my table (laughter). Oh sorry. I have to get a new pair of glasses. I can't seem to see things your way (laughter). You get the joke? HAHA. Again, we yield the floor

Rachel Jane Adams, A.P.S, PhD, A.S, M.Phil
Shadow Spokesperson for Health
MP for Parlos Decina's 20th District

Date17:09:21, January 06, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Local Exchange Act of July 3963
MessageWhatever. Never mind.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 170

no
      

Total Seats: 477

abstain
   

Total Seats: 103


Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640

Random quote: "Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names." - John F. Kennedy

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57