We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: For a new military
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union der Dundorfer Alorias
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3964
Description[?]:
New bills to reform our military. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Current: The Government leaves this to the army to decide upon.
Proposed: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Proposed: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:49:53, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Union der Dundorfer Alorias | To | Debating the For a new military |
Message | To reform our military. |
Date | 16:19:24, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party (Plaid Ryddfrydol) | To | Debating the For a new military |
Message | More dangerous policy. We will again oppose. |
Date | 20:06:04, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the For a new military |
Message | Oppose. |
Date | 21:29:37, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Progressive Socialist Party (PRO-SPA) | To | Debating the For a new military |
Message | We completely support this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 72 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 410 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 63 |
Random fact: Treaties will be eligible for deletion if they are more than 50 in-game years old and have no currently ratified members. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |