We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Tansport
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Workers Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3967
Description[?]:
This Bill would bring transport completely under public ownership |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Current: Private companies operate regional TOC's. The national service is provided by a publicly owned, national TOC.
Proposed: There is a single privately owned national TOC.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on airports.
Old value:: The government leaves airports entirely to the private sector.
Current: The government has some involvement in the ownership and operation of airports, but leaves a role for the private sector too.
Proposed: The government owns and operates all airports.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:31:01, January 12, 2016 CET | From | Hutamale Hut Hut Tamale Parking Ticket | To | Debating the Tansport |
Message | OOC: Is article 1 a mistake? "a single *privately* owned national TOC"? Just checking before my propaganda machine whips up a socialist storm. :P |
Date | 09:04:27, January 13, 2016 CET | From | The Workers Party | To | Debating the Tansport |
Message | Mr speaker The Workers party has made a grave mistake we stupidly rushed through the proposals section an thought we were making a single public transportation operator we may only apologise to the Hutori citizen for it is them we let down today |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 318 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 282 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "We live in a world in which politics has replaced philosophy." - Martin L. Gross |