Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5470
Next month in: 00:08:46
Server time: 11:51:13, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Incest Act of December 3966

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Socialist Confederation

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3967

Description[?]:

Incestuous acts will be legal and incestuous marriages will be legally recognised.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:39:48, January 12, 2016 CET
FromRISE Movement
ToDebating the Incest Act of December 3966
MessageAC could you provide reason for me to support inbreeding?

Date20:27:28, January 12, 2016 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Confederation
ToDebating the Incest Act of December 3966
MessageCould the so-called "Democratic" Unionist Party provide the Senate with reasoning to criminalize sex? Incestuous acts is not inbreeding, neither are inbred lives lesser, nor should the government enforce these eugenics.

Date20:43:13, January 12, 2016 CET
FromRISE Movement
ToDebating the Incest Act of December 3966
MessageI asked the question first. I've not voted either way yet to do not use this as an excuse to attack me.

Date21:25:57, January 12, 2016 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Incest Act of December 3966
MessageWe completely support this motion by the Anarchists. Incest doesn't harm anyone. As long as there's consent, any sex should be legal.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 202

no
  

Total Seats: 174

abstain
   

Total Seats: 49


Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

Random quote: “Their cheap talk of the 'greater good' is a thinly concealed excuse for subordinating the people to the institutionalized violence that is the state.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55