We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pet Regulations
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Beluzians
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2175
Description[?]:
| The government does not need to know how many or what type of domesticated animals you have. At the same time, people should not remove wild animals from their natural environments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the ownership of domestic animals as pets.
Old value:: People must register domestic animals with the national government.
Current: There are no laws regarding domestic animal ownership.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding domestic animal ownership.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Current: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Proposed: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:42:31, January 19, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Pet Regulations |
| Message | The first proposal relates to a national registry was created for all domesticated animals, in order to facilitate the recovery of lost pets, and their return to their rightful owner. |
| Date | 07:26:34, January 20, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Pet Regulations |
| Message | Where is that stipulated? |
| Date | 07:30:40, January 20, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Pet Regulations |
| Message | http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=14563 Way back in July of 2099. |
| Date | 04:10:31, January 23, 2006 CET | From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Pet Regulations |
| Message | These articles are contradictory, one involves less government regulation and one involves more regulation. How can anyone vote for or against this bill without being seen as contradicting himself? |
| Date | 05:16:56, January 23, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Pet Regulations |
| Message | But you have to contradict yourself to be a politician. |
| Date | 12:25:18, January 23, 2006 CET | From | People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia | To | Debating the Pet Regulations |
| Message | Just vote no, thats the easy answer. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 18 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 32 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 50 |
| Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
| Random quote: First and second class seats on public transport shall be BANNED! We are all FIRST CLASS people, regardless of whether we are rich or poor and can afford or not afford to pay for a more expensive seat. From now on, all seats on trains, buses, trams, planes and so on shall be the SAME. We will all travel in the SAME way, TOGETHER. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |