Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 02:24:56
Server time: 13:35:03, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | itsjustgav | LC73DunMHP | nikita hengel | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 3970

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamese Social Democratic Party (LSDP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3970

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:54:42, January 19, 2016 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3970
MessageMr. Speaker,

Considering that over 13% of our seats are vacant, we think that the best thing to do would be to hold an early election to fill those seats.

--

Trevor Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG

Date23:20:58, January 19, 2016 CET
FromLodamese National Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3970
MessageMr. Speaker.

We are unhappy that the government shuffling the cabinet continously. My voters so not trust this government.

Zack De Rogue
Co Leader of the LNUP

Date04:14:31, January 20, 2016 CET
FromLodamese Social Democratic Party (LSDP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3970
MessageMr. De Rouge,

We haven't reshuffled the cabinet once, a new cabinet has not been passed since the last election, and the other proposals have failed to pass. As such, a cabinet representative of the new balance of power has not been passed.

Ilyana Petrova,
LSDP Leader

Date10:52:42, January 20, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3970
MessageM. Speaker,

Of course under normal circumstances, the LPA would gladly vote in favour of a LSDP led Government. But due to the current international situation, coupled with the fact that the election is just 5 months away, a cabinet reshuffle (that includes a change in the Minister of Defense) is just not the best idea at the moment.

The LPA look forward to supporting a LSDP led Government if they remain the largest party after the election.

Susan Gibbs
Prime Minister

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 232

no
    

Total Seats: 288

abstain
 

Total Seats: 79


Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well.

Random quote: "How can you govern a country which has 246 varieties of cheese?" Charles De Gaulle, "Les Mots du General

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70