Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 02:05:36
Server time: 05:54:23, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Ahmad | Aur3ale | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Committee on Party Identity and Branding

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4066

Description[?]:

Why don't we rationalise our branding to make sure voters are able to distinguish between us more easily?

I am talking particularly about colours here. There is a particular problem with the use of similar shades of red by my party, the Workers' Union, and the RMP. I chose my particular shade of red in order to distinguish my party from the Workers' Front (as it was then called), but now that they have changed, I would quite like to adopt that brighter shade.

Anyway, in general, why don't we try to stick to the following guide:

Black: Left Anarchism, Fascism
Blue: Conservatism, Nationalism
Brown: Fascism
Green: Environmentalism. Ahmadism, Ahmadist Democracy
Orange: Populism, Hosian Democracy
Pink: Social Democracy, Socialism,
Purple: Feminism, Monarchism
Red: Socialism, Communism, Social Democracy
White: Monarchism
Yellow: Liberalism

Let me know what you think.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:19:57, January 22, 2016 CET
From Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Committee on Party Identity and Branding
Message(OOC:)

I agree with this, good idea.




Date23:01:54, January 24, 2016 CET
From Great Rutania party
ToDebating the Committee on Party Identity and Branding
MessageOOC: I think this is an excellent idea and are more than happy to change our party colour according to this. But do we make this change now or wait until there is a vote on it?

Date20:10:01, February 13, 2016 CET
From Rutanian Restoration Party
ToDebating the Committee on Party Identity and Branding
MessageOOC: Are these colors loosely based on the party alignment colors in Victoria 2? It looks similar, but in the most awesome way because I love that game.

Date13:40:18, July 29, 2016 CET
From Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Committee on Party Identity and Branding
MessageGood idea

Date17:13:59, July 29, 2016 CET
From Former Nationmaster of Rutania
ToDebating the Committee on Party Identity and Branding
MessageWhy has this just been sent to the vote, it has been around for a long time and we already had a re evaluation rendering this proposal null and void.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
      

    Total Seats: 116

    abstain
          

    Total Seats: 384


    Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

    Random quote: "The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites.'" - Larry Hardiman

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61