Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 00:13:12
Server time: 03:46:47, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Secular Schooling Protection Bill of 3975

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Progress Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3976

Description[?]:

School should be a secular affair and religious schools should still need to meet certain regulatory standards set by the government.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:47:18, January 28, 2016 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the Secular Schooling Protection Bill of 3975
MessageIs the FPP proposing we make secularism the state-religion too? Secular schools already do not permit prayer, why force this onto religious schools?

Date05:58:08, January 29, 2016 CET
FromFederal Progress Party
ToDebating the Secular Schooling Protection Bill of 3975
MessageChildren do not control which school they are sent to if they wish to engage in prayer those activities can be engaged outside of the education environment.

Date17:53:08, January 29, 2016 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Secular Schooling Protection Bill of 3975
MessageChildren attending religious schools often do so because they are religious themselves. Children in religious schools have very right to practice their religion as part of their education - or at least during the school day via these teacher-led prayers. There's absolutely nothing wrong with that: I think it's a ridiculous assertion to suggest that children attending religious schools had no say whatsoever over their education.

Date19:55:53, January 29, 2016 CET
FromFederal Progress Party
ToDebating the Secular Schooling Protection Bill of 3975
MessageWhy would you assume a child would have control over what school he is sent to? If they wish to seek religion they can do so outside of the education environment.

Date20:00:19, January 30, 2016 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Secular Schooling Protection Bill of 3975
MessageThis is a worrying attack on religious freedoms.

Date11:55:33, January 31, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Secular Schooling Protection Bill of 3975
MessageWe support a secular state but we believe that this bill has gone too far

Date03:43:08, February 01, 2016 CET
FromFederal Progress Party
ToDebating the Secular Schooling Protection Bill of 3975
MessageIn no way does this restrict the practice of any religion except withing this very specific circumstance. Would the parliament be open to a bill containing only article 1?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 306

no
    

Total Seats: 444

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra.

    Random quote: "Whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither, in my opinion, is safe." - Edmund Burke

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 73