We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: In Defence Of The Family
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3976
Description[?]:
| We as a nation must protect our tradition family values. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is allowed.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:56:29, January 30, 2016 CET | From | Federal Progress Party | To | Debating the In Defence Of The Family |
| Message | Just why? Is there literally any reason practical or otherwise? I see what you are trying to do here but can you back it up in any way? |
| Date | 02:05:05, January 31, 2016 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the In Defence Of The Family |
| Message | Article 2 should be to dissolve that issue to local governments, otherwise, we agree with this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 215 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 535 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
| Random quote: "Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity." - Albert Einstein |