We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Age Adjustment Act 3979
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3979
Description[?]:
| Currently the retirement age is at 65. However we believe to tackle youth unemployment and to not make people work for too long, the retirement age should be set to 60. With all the illnesses that can claim lives at around that age, and the fact that so many jobs are needed for young people with older people who would prefer to retire unable to do so, we believe it makes perfect sense to lower the retirement age. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 65
Current: 67
Proposed: 60
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:58:43, February 06, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Retirement Age Adjustment Act 3979 |
| Message | Mr Speaker This is ridicolous. Is the Choice trying to scrap experience and wisdom in society?? I yield. |
| Date | 13:49:12, February 06, 2016 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Retirement Age Adjustment Act 3979 |
| Message | Mr Speaker No, because people in their 50s still have experience and wisdom, we shouldn't be forcing people to work for so long in their lives. Many people don't even make it past 70, they'll have had barely any life to themselves. Joshua Maisey Leader of Choice |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 238 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 207 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." - Ambrose Bierce |