We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Education Secularization Act 3982
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3983
Description[?]:
The LSP strongly believe in the secularization of all schools, school and education is no place for religion, schools are a place to learn and equip young people for the future. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Current: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Proposed: Religious schools are not allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.
Old value:: The government leaves this decision up to the schools themselves.
Current: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden, except in religious schools.
Proposed: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:26:45, February 12, 2016 CET | From | Partito Monarchico | To | Debating the Education Secularization Act 3982 |
Message | Statement from the Monarchist Party: We STRONGLY oppose this bill! It is impossible to "equip young people for the future" without eternal truths - otherwise, the government will impose arbitrary and subjective truths upon them. We cannot allow this. |
Date | 13:43:29, February 12, 2016 CET | From | Social Democratic | To | Debating the Education Secularization Act 3982 |
Message | Whilst we do support the regulations put forward here, we don't believe such activities should be forbidden. However, we would welcome an advance from the Liberal Socialist Party on how we can work together to ensure that these activities are strongly regulated. |
Date | 14:22:41, February 12, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Education Secularization Act 3982 |
Message | Mr Speaker We would be open to negotiations with the Social Democratic Party. Jeremy Perez Leader of the LSP |
Date | 04:22:27, February 13, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Council Party | To | Debating the Education Secularization Act 3982 |
Message | Hmm, may I say that banning relglious schools isn't the move, but rather regulating and ensuring that they don't brainwash kids into dangerous ideologies. José Ibárruri Leader of the PSC |
Date | 15:01:48, February 13, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Union | To | Debating the Education Secularization Act 3982 |
Message | We don't agree with this. And I think that the Liberal Socialist Party is finding itself on the wrong side of public opinion of many of the issues put before the Senate! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 750 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle |