Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 02:41:56
Server time: 05:18:03, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): burgerboys | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Advertisement Regulation Act 3982

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3983

Description[?]:

A bid to regulate advertisements to sensible and honest standards.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:31:18, February 13, 2016 CET
FromAll Progressive Party
ToDebating the Advertisement Regulation Act 3982
MessageWe need all sorts for variety and diversity. No!

Date14:40:31, February 13, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Socialist Party
ToDebating the Advertisement Regulation Act 3982
MessageMr Speaker

Our proposal would simply regulate advertisements so that they do not lie or use subliminal messages. These reforms are to keep the people safe from misleading advertisements.

Jeremy Perez
Leader of the LSP

Date15:07:47, February 13, 2016 CET
FromConservative Union
ToDebating the Advertisement Regulation Act 3982
MessageWe need less Government regulation when it comes to business, not more.

Date19:28:47, February 13, 2016 CET
FromPartito Monarchico
ToDebating the Advertisement Regulation Act 3982
MessageStatement from the Monarchist Party:

We are inclined to agree with the Conservative Union on this. The government should not attempt to push itself upon advertisement more than is required.

Alfredo Gentile
Buccho Brotherhood Faction

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 0

no
    

Total Seats: 750

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Politics is the art of the possible." - Otto von Bismarck

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60