We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Advertisement Regulation Act 3982
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3983
Description[?]:
A bid to regulate advertisements to sensible and honest standards. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on advertising
Old value:: All advertising is permitted.
Current: Only advertising that meets certain set standards is permitted.
Proposed: Only advertising that meets certain set standards is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:31:18, February 13, 2016 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Advertisement Regulation Act 3982 |
Message | We need all sorts for variety and diversity. No! |
Date | 14:40:31, February 13, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Advertisement Regulation Act 3982 |
Message | Mr Speaker Our proposal would simply regulate advertisements so that they do not lie or use subliminal messages. These reforms are to keep the people safe from misleading advertisements. Jeremy Perez Leader of the LSP |
Date | 15:07:47, February 13, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Union | To | Debating the Advertisement Regulation Act 3982 |
Message | We need less Government regulation when it comes to business, not more. |
Date | 19:28:47, February 13, 2016 CET | From | Partito Monarchico | To | Debating the Advertisement Regulation Act 3982 |
Message | Statement from the Monarchist Party: We are inclined to agree with the Conservative Union on this. The government should not attempt to push itself upon advertisement more than is required. Alfredo Gentile Buccho Brotherhood Faction |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 750 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Politics is the art of the possible." - Otto von Bismarck |