We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, December 3985
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: August 3986
Description[?]:
| We, the National Liberal Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:57:09, February 19, 2016 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 3985 |
| Message | To fill the seats abandoned by the Tories. |
| Date | 19:17:49, February 19, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 3985 |
| Message | OOC: don't know what happened? At least got quickly re activated |
| Date | 23:39:22, February 19, 2016 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Call for early elections, December 3985 |
| Message | OOC: I was wondering the same thing. It is simply not possible for a party to gain zero seats for visibility ratings such as your own. The only time such a case may happen is if the legislature has an extremely limited number of seats, but not with 750. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 322 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 305 |
| Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |