We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gun Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lutte Féministe de Libération
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2174
Description[?]:
| Because some people need guns to defend themselves. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Current: Adult individuals are allowed to own and purchase guns freely.
Proposed: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:50:23, January 21, 2006 CET | From |  Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Gun Rights |
| Message | Yes, we support. We should have the right to defend ourselves. |
| Date | 04:30:34, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the Gun Rights |
| Message | As I stated before, LPP, I will back this bill...but I would ask that in return you support my bill for Military Intelligence. |
| Date | 10:09:54, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Gun Rights |
| Message | No, no and NO! When do you people understand, for crying out loud? Giving individuals firearms is hazardous! First of all, the history discribed there is not restrictive enough, what about people with a history of mental illness or non-violent criminality? And, results from the past hold no guarantee for the future! Anybody with a weapon can use it, and even if they have no negative history, that negative history can start any day of the week! Plus, people who have no negative history could sell it further or merely have no negative history because it was not recorded! Who knows what they have done? You make a bad example for all of the people. What if children of people who own a firearm decide to play with such a toy? That one does not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality does not mean it will not happen, it does not mean they will have the responsibility, it does not mean they will use it properly! |
| Date | 21:05:07, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Gun Rights |
| Message | To arms my brothers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wait... Would I qualify for a gun if I acted a bit crazy there? |
| Date | 23:06:54, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Gun Rights |
| Message | No. :P |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 284 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 216 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362 |
| Random quote: "You will win, but you will not convince. You will win, because you possess more than enough brute force, but you will not convince, because to convince means to persuade. And in order to persuade you would need what you lack, reason and right in the struggle." - Miguel de Unamuno |