Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 03:05:28
Server time: 16:54:31, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ADM Drax | burgerboys | Nileowen_Kir | R Drax | SE33 | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Details

Submitted by[?]: Moderate Beluzians

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2174

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:52:01, January 21, 2006 CET
FromSecular Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Message"Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization" This "treaty" contains socialist phrases like that everywhere. Not only that, but the Republic would then be subject to the arbitrary sanction of "international laws" which is an invalid concept. Our citizen would be at the arbitrary disposal of some invalid international "treaty".

Date08:29:31, January 21, 2006 CET
FromLiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
ToDebating the Ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
MessageApparently, they oppose Human Rights.

Date12:47:12, January 21, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
MessageI could go either way. I also dislike the wording and assumptions, but the end result isn't a big concern.

Date02:42:44, January 22, 2006 CET
FromSecular Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
MessageI do oppose "Human Rights" because it is an anti-concept. I support Individual Rights.

Date02:47:46, January 22, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
MessageThe only individual is God. He is our Monad, our foundation of being.

Date03:10:44, January 22, 2006 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
MessageI'm w the girls on this one, why not, it won't pass anyhow...

anybody have clue what the voters think about treaties?

Date02:55:25, January 23, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the Ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
MessageI don't think the voters care so much about the treaties as the proposals that they carry with them. Though, the isolationism v. globalism factor might influence voter preceptions.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 46

no
    

Total Seats: 54

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

    Random quote: "Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man." - Stewart Udall

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58