Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 02:34:16
Server time: 01:25:43, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Hunting and Fishing

Details

Submitted by[?]: Moderate Beluzians

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2175

Description[?]:

This promotes both a sustainable population of hunted animals and provides safety and security to neighboring areas.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:57:57, January 22, 2006 CET
FromSecular Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Hunting and Fishing
MessageIf all property is private as it should be, then this is a non-issue. Property owners make these decisions themselves.

Date21:34:39, January 22, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the Hunting and Fishing
MessageAll property is not private.

Date04:14:00, January 23, 2006 CET
FromSecular Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Hunting and Fishing
MessageThat's not the point though. It ***should*** be. Therefore it is only appropriate to create laws that work on that premise.

Date20:25:34, January 23, 2006 CET
FromPartisans And Artisans League
ToDebating the Hunting and Fishing
MessageThat is a very good point that has never occured to me. All property is 'owned' in some form or another, and I doubt very much of it is owned by the government.

Government's tend to 'own' land through institutions, for example a park authority in which case this organisation could restrict hunting without it becoming national law. The organisation in charge of the land can have a personal say on what goes on, on that land without governmental interference. All other land is private, where the government should not be interfering.

Date02:18:27, January 24, 2006 CET
FromModerate Beluzians
ToDebating the Hunting and Fishing
MessageI think I should be a millionare. So I'm going to start buying everything I want without worry of consequences. Yeash, stop living in a fantasy world.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 32

no
    

Total Seats: 54

abstain
  

Total Seats: 14


Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols.

Random quote: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything!" - Rick Santorum

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56