We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3990
Description[?]:
Mr. Speaker, This is the most just for the people against a powerful government. Taylor Robinson Leader LP |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Current: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Proposed: The victim of eminent domain sets compensation, government can appeal to the courts if they deem the cost too high.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:03:07, February 26, 2016 CET | From | Alliance | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Reform |
Message | Mr Speaker, Eminent domain is crucial in the development of our nation's infrastructure. Nimbyism's only cure will be gone forever if eminent domain is indeed banned. However, we do support article II for the eminent domain has its flaws, yet not so deadly that it can be banned completely. John Christie, MP (Progressives) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 84 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 147 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 269 |
Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken |