Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:19:50
Server time: 20:40:09, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Arusu-Weareback | Liu Che | Tayes3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3989

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet with Senior parties that:

- behave.
- don't insult the Imperial Chancellor.
- respect the Cultural Heritage of Luthori.
- don't want a civil war.
- values pragmatism and cooperation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:38:10, February 26, 2016 CET
FromConservative Right
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker

The liberal alliance has throw out everything that even resembled a right to Centre cabinet. In fact I'm starting to wonder if we are the only party on the right left?

Francis Urquhart leader of the moderate party

Date08:27:43, February 26, 2016 CET
FromUnited Centre
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

My party has consistently voted to strip away regulations that are unnecessary. We side with the socialists, not on ideology but due to your behaviour.

Larissa Newton

Date08:54:51, February 26, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker

We are glad that at least 3Right has the mind to understand that unity is better than total domestic chaos.

I yield.

Date09:09:49, February 26, 2016 CET
FromConservative Right
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker

With 3rights track record they should be careful about talking about behavior.

And we have not caused domestic chaos. We laid forward a budget. That is all we did. The strikers are free to stop whenever they want but this is not our fault! We have been bullied and shut out... But we will still push for our politics. We were elected and will try to do right by our voters.

I yield

Date16:18:20, February 26, 2016 CET
FromFreeborn Luthorians/Freeborn Coalition
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
Message"We must put away the sword for times like this when our future is unclear. We will support this cabinet. As well I feel that it's an insult in of itself to claim we still want a war, or that we started it all on our own"
Vladimir Armstrong
Vice_Leader of the LPU

Date16:41:40, February 26, 2016 CET
FromConservative Right
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker.. As we say here Vladimir

The one who brought forward a sword is you. The ones who acted immature and hurt this country for political gain. We have done no wrong

Date16:48:04, February 26, 2016 CET
FromUnited Centre
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

Look at our history! Voting against unions and for capitalism! We are not left wing. We just won't subsidise our environment's destruction.

Larissa Newton

Date17:21:49, February 26, 2016 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

Although we are supporting this cabinet we find that classing every party not in this cabinet as behaving badly, insulting the imperial Chancellor, don't respect Luthori's heratige, wanting a civil war AND don't value cooperation.

David Smith
CUP Leader

Date17:49:08, February 26, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker

Dear NCUP. Your party don't held all those problems. We just remembered the fuss last time you were in the Cabinet. No offence.

I yield.

Date18:37:38, February 26, 2016 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

One minister resigned which was completely fine. A resignation doesn't make a whole party in the wrong. This cabinet doesn't include the Moderates clearly showing they were part of the problem.

David Smith
CUP Leader

Date18:42:26, February 26, 2016 CET
FromConservative Right
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker

Is it not nice to be able to blame your mistakes on others? The CUP are experts at this. It's always our fault no matter what happens. Take some responsibility and change the fact that you are untrustworthy!

Francis Urquhart leader of the moderate party

Date19:45:16, February 26, 2016 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

The Moderate Party mustn't realise I said part of the problem. We do take some responsibility but it was down to your comments that the Minister resigned.

David Smith
CUP Leader

Date19:53:19, February 26, 2016 CET
FromConservative Right
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

Yet still you feel like some of the blame is on us. Even though we did everything we promised you and more?

Francis Urquhart leader of the Moderate party

Date20:55:36, February 26, 2016 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

You've been rude to so many parties of this House. You talk of democracy yet your quick to call Communists undemocratic. You promised us very little. Some of the blame is most definitely on you.

David Smith
CUP Leader

Date21:26:40, February 26, 2016 CET
FromFreeborn Luthorians/Freeborn Coalition
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
Message"Mr. Speaker"

"I would like to ask, how the moderates can never agree with us. You can't even agree that we want peace. I myself I've had enough of your basic insults and you're misunderstanding of all the other parties in the House of Commons. I will request this, only once, bury the sword, let go of your hate. We where elected to this house to bring forth what the people have requested of us, this request was not hate so please act your age."
Elizabeth Genn
Leader of the LPU

Date21:27:20, February 26, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker

Please Gents, everyone inside the Cabinet knows why they're there. And everyone outside knows what's needed to get back inside.

I yield.

Date22:00:06, February 26, 2016 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

May the Liberal Alliance refrain from bully boy tactics? "If you want to be popular you must do what we say" is basically what you meant. I think I know why the CUP haven't been included this time - we've took a stand against the monarchy. Those inside the cabinet are there to keep control. The CUP has refrained from striking but we might not be so generous next time round.

David Smith
CUP Leader

Date23:42:03, February 26, 2016 CET
FromFreeborn Luthorians/Freeborn Coalition
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
Message"Mr. Speaker"

"Do you not understand the fact that the communists aren't just 'some other socialist movement' may I remind you that we are growing with each election and taking votes from both the SDL and HSP, not to offend the others, we'll continue to support stability as long as its in good will, as well that the Authoritarian reforms the royalists passed during the revolt and when we returned, to be reverted."
"I yield"
Vladimir Armstrong
Vice-Leader of the LPU

Date00:00:47, February 27, 2016 CET
FromConservative Right
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

Vladimir don't think that you are some people movement who is here to liberate them from the oppression. Your so called activists... or as i would say. Criminals and vandals. Are just young people who have either made the wrong choices or those choices were made for them. Most of them most likely lack a job and have skipped out on defending our great country. I would like to remind the LPU that the moderate party has only been growing since this party was founded. You are not a party for the people. You are a party for the government.

Amanda Millington candidate for minster of defense

Date04:43:08, February 27, 2016 CET
FromFreeborn Luthorians/Freeborn Coalition
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
Message"Mr. Speaker"
"Have you ever been at our protests? Its people of all age groups, all occupations, all races, standing together signing, chanting, and marching, as one. I'd like for us to take a look at the Moderate's voter pool, well its mainly rednecks and old people, if we are just teens and young adults, I'd pick that over your voting pool any day."
"I yield"
Vladimir Armstrong
Vice-Leader of the LPU

Date08:00:23, February 27, 2016 CET
FromConservative Right
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker

Don't be silly. I have had your voters vandalize my car and threaten my life. And i have seen your protests...Most of them are pure hate against me or any of the other capitalist party's. And you mislead young teens to join your party by tricking them in to thinking they are part of some movement...when in reality all you are doing is turning them in to vandals. Our voters comes from all classes and see the problems we face in our society.

Francis Urquhart leader of the moderate party

Date08:27:57, February 27, 2016 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

You're digging yourself a deeper hole. If at the next election i had to chose between the Moderates and the LPU I think you'd guess who I'd chose. I'd chose the party that is built by hope. That inspires people. Not a party built on hate.

David Smith
CUP Leader

Date08:46:04, February 27, 2016 CET
FromConservative Right
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker

We are quite worried that a Centre right party... As you call yourself. Would support a undemocratic communist party that has caused violence In our country.

Francis Urquhart leader of the moderate party

Date15:15:39, February 27, 2016 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Senior Cabinet Proposal of March 3989
MessageMr Speaker,

You talk of them as undemocratic yet you're not willing to accept politicians are not allowed opinions? Your party campaign has been designed from hate. That is the most undemocratic thing you can do. The LPU bring hope to the people of Luthori. Anyone who values hate over hope is clearly crazy. I am a centre to soft left MP who hopes to bring the CUP to the soft left!

David Smith
CUP Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 464

no
 

Total Seats: 36

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

    Random quote: "Politics is all about compromises and negotiations, nothing more, nothing less." - Augusto Amadeo, former Istalian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 95