Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5471
Next month in: 00:03:32
Server time: 23:56:27, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ameerali | DanivonX | Dx6743 | hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Socialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3990

Description[?]:

We believe on the condition that the animals in question are not harmed, we should permit its legality. Whilst we can all agree this isn't exactly a very nice practise, we believe the government shouldn't be involved in its laws too much.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:17:49, February 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito Monarchico
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageMr. Speaker;

I would put forward a motion that Mr. Perez and his associates have any and all pets under their care put under protection protection. I fear for their dignity.

*laughter from the Monarchist Party section*

Prisco Bellucci
Partito Monarchico

Date00:18:02, February 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito Monarchico
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageOOC: *police protection

Date00:21:59, February 27, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Socialist Party
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageMr Speaker

A very mature and well thought out joke from the Monarchists, a party advocating random installation of a monarchy that doesn't even exist.

*roaring laughter from the LSP Members of Senate*

Whilst the act of bestiality of very bizarre to us all here in the Senate, we believe provided no creatures are harmed it should be allowed. It's not our place to outright ban the act.

Jeremy Perez
Leader of the LSP

Date00:30:56, February 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito Monarchico
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageOh dear, Mr. Speaker, it would appear that Mr. Perez is as away with the Monarchist Party's platform as he is about the laws of nature! I would invite him to visit our website to learn more, but he'll find it very boring - no goat pictures.

*chuckles from the Monarchist Party section*

But, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Perez tells us that, while the LSP assures us that they find it "very bizarre," that it is "not their place eto outright ban the act." With this Senate having approved of sodomy, and now pushing for bestiality, I ponder what is next for our nation? Will this government demand that pedophilia be accepted, so long as no children are harmed? Will pedophiles themselves be exempted from any legal action or psychological evaluation? Even if he wants to put forward that the LSP and others are trying to be fair, there will be no doubt that this will not end well for our Republic.

Prisco Bellucci
Partito Monarchico

Date00:32:56, February 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito Monarchico
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageOOC: *is as aware

DANG IT. dajspodksaodpkasodas

Date00:49:42, February 27, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Socialist Party
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageMr Speaker

Perhaps that's because we don't concern ourselves with an irrelevant far-right party.

Our party would never, ever endorse any form of paedophilia. Children and animals are very different, are you comparing our children to animals? Children no matter what will be damaged by paedophilia, if not physically than most definitely mentally. However animals don't have the same issues as us human beings, and not the same rights. Tell me, does your party enjoy eating meat? Do your Mr Bellucci enjoy a nice steak or roast chicken? Well animals are murdered for that *sarcastically pouts*. Now if we proposed allowing children to be culled for meat then that would be immoral beyond any redemption, everyone would be opposed. So you see, children and animals don't have the same rights!

Jeremy Perez
Leader of the LSP

Date00:57:53, February 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito Monarchico
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageMr. Speaker;

I only EAT my meat. I don't want to know what Mr. Perez does with his.

*chuckles from the Monarchist Party*

I seem to be aware of long ago when people scoffed at the idea of sodomy being legalized. Then they scoffed at bestiality. Now they're scoffing at pedophilia. I'll let that sink in for the sane members of the Senate.

Prisco Bellucci
Partito Monarchico

Date01:07:14, February 27, 2016 CET
FromLiberal Socialist Party
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageMr Speaker

Such childish remarks from Mr Bellucci will not get him and his party of closet racists and sexists very far.

The difference between sodomy and bestiality, with the former in particular between paedophilia is that they are not overall condemned worldwide whilst paedophilia is. It is merely that our nation was highly restrictive in social policies, unhealthily restrictive.

Jeremy Perez
Leader of the LSP

Date02:01:23, February 27, 2016 CET
FromPartito Monarchico
ToDebating the Bestiality Liberalization Act 3989
MessageMr. Speaker;

We have never denied differences. The LSP is once again revealing it knows little else than to repeat arguments, rather than defend them logically. I'd like to know if BESTIALITY is being accepted worldwide, since Mr. Perez is now resorting to argumentum ad populums to defend his basis of morality. I'd like to know what percentage of governments worldwide are accepting bestiality as a perfectly legal and acceptable sexual relationship.

As for closet sexists, I'll admit we are quite openly sexist, actually. After all, we don't have any women in our party...oh, dearest me, I think we do!

*Ileana Napolitani, and other members of Women of Vintallia, wave their hands from the bench. The other members of the party chuckle.*

Thank you for that correction!

*sits back down to more chuckles*

Prisco Bellucci
Partito Monarchico

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 189

no
   

Total Seats: 290

abstain
  

Total Seats: 271


Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37

Random quote: "Difference of religion breeds more quarrels than difference of politics." - Wendell Phillips

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55