We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Responsibility of Proposing a Coalition Government Act 3992
Details
Submitted by[?]: All Progressive Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3993
Description[?]:
| The All Progressive Party believes that the head of state should be entitled to be the one responsible with proposing a coalition cabinet. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:16:56, March 03, 2016 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Responsibility of Proposing a Coalition Government Act 3992 |
| Message | Let's start with discussion first. |
| Date | 00:30:15, March 03, 2016 CET | From | Good Folk | To | Debating the Responsibility of Proposing a Coalition Government Act 3992 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This is a great idea! You've got all these mainstream politicians. They are all about discussing, but they hate when they actually have to do anything, that's why forming a government takes so long for them. Almost a year, even. We need action, the world is collapsing around us, there is risk of war, these fortune seekers that have come to our country: all in all, this is a good proposal. We support. Dido Saffron-Castore |
| Date | 08:56:14, March 03, 2016 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Responsibility of Proposing a Coalition Government Act 3992 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The All Progressive Party wishes to thank the Good Folk Party for its support of the 3992 responsibility act. You're indeed right, just adopting a cabinet takes a year we need quick action and need to see more results from government for the past two and the current all haven't done close to anything. Li Jonathan Senate representative All Progressive Party |
| Date | 02:20:19, March 05, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Responsibility of Proposing a Coalition Government Act 3992 |
| Message | It could make things difficult in future, especially if an inactive party gets the presidency! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 619 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 131 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: Wait a min was we tricked into voting for absolute monarchy (Jamie Jamesson, Chancellor of Luthori 4269-4310) |