We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Reform Act of 3992
Details
Submitted by[?]: Imperial Conservative Union (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3992
Description[?]:
Allowing the government to use the empire lands for the continued well-being of the empire. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:56:07, March 03, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Right | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Reform Act of 3992 |
Message | Mr Speaker, In what way is it right to steal private property from individuals? If i have saved enough money to buy a house then the state has no right to take away property from private people. We are however willing to make one exception. If a crucial military base or complex is to be built then it is okay. But otherwise it is now! Stephanie McBain leader of the moderate party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 412 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 88 | |||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
Random quote: "Communism, like any other revealed religion, is largely made up of prophecies." - H. L. Mencken |