We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom of Religious Expression Act, November 3993
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Worker's Union (WU)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3994
Description[?]:
Mr Speaker, While I, as many other Rutanian's, am an atheist I view the freedom to express your religion as a fundamental human right. To disallow public officials from wearing religious symbols or clothing is discrimination against those of us who are religious, and this must be changed. Wearing religious symbols or clothing has no bearing on ones ability to perform their job, and as such it should not be restricted. Scott Pearson, Chairman of the Worker's Union |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 210 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 290 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell) |