Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5474
Next month in: 00:33:45
Server time: 23:26:14, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): dnobb | Dx6743 | luthorian3059 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Unity Coalition Cabinet Reshuffle

Details

Submitted by[?]: Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3996

Description[?]:

Total seats in coalition 613

613/12= 51.08 quota

Largest party gets finance and foreign ministry (DLP)

DLP 204/51.08 = 3.99
BCCP 94/51.08 = 1.84
FEIP 80/51.08 = 1.56
BPDP 79/51.08= 1.54
OM 79/51.08 = 1.54
RP 77/51.08 = 1.5

DLP 4 seats (including Finance and Foreign)
BCCP 2 seat
FEIP 1 seat
BPDP 1 seat
OM 1 seat
RP 1 seat

2 remaining seats to allocate
*As none of the remaining quota can be rounded to 1, the second place and fourth place parties will receive seats

DLP -0.01
BCCP 0.84 +1
FEIP 0.32
BPDP 0.3 +1
OM 0.3
RP 0.27

Final

DLP 4 seats
BCCP 3 seats
FEIP 1 seat
BPDP 2 seats
OM 1 seat
RP 1 seat

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:43:48, March 10, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Unity Coalition Cabinet Reshuffle
MessageOur party statistics department calculated everything wrong. He thought that the Tories were still in. Sorry for the confusion

Date03:41:42, March 10, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Unity Coalition Cabinet Reshuffle
MessageMay we ask why the OM is opposing this cabinet reshuffle? Are they not satisfied with the position given to them?

Date05:27:33, March 10, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Unity Coalition Cabinet Reshuffle
MessageNever mind about this. We will vote No too

Date22:27:29, March 10, 2016 CET
FromOur Movement
ToDebating the Unity Coalition Cabinet Reshuffle
MessageWe would be satisfied if we were given either foreign affairs, military, or both

Date05:33:40, March 11, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Unity Coalition Cabinet Reshuffle
MessageFirst of all, you can't get foreign affairs. Didn't you read this bill:

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=462173

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
            

    Total Seats: 636

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

      Random quote: "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them." - Bill Vaughn

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 66