We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 3996
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3996
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Radical Liberal Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Social Democratic
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Radical Liberal Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Social Democratic
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Radical Liberal Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social Democratic
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Radical Liberal Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Social Democratic
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Radical Liberal Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:33:25, March 11, 2016 CET | From | Social Democratic | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3996 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Whilst we appreciate the invitation by our colleagues in the radical party, we do not believe that a partnership with the all progressives would benefit our constituents. We regretfully decline. |
| Date | 10:39:38, March 11, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3996 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Whilst we concede that the Gaduri people have spoken, and have duly elected the Radical Party to be the largest party, it is clear that already, before the legislative session has even begun in earnest, President Yifan is leading an anaemic, whimpering Government, that cannot even reach a consensus when inviting other parties to join it in power! Let this be a warning, that we will not stand by and allow this Senate to plummet into chaos. If the Radical party cannot agree on a coalition, we would support a proposal in which they lead a minority Government. The people have spoken after all. Let them branch out on their own, for once, without being propped up by the true political parties of Gaduridos! |
| Date | 11:04:30, March 11, 2016 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3996 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The All Progressive Party wishes to note that many political parties in Gaduridos are quick to dismiss its offer of service whenever it proposes it or is invited to partner in a coalition government. But its these same parties that if in power don't do anything for the term ending in elections which they heavily contest. Let us work when we are called upon, we are also here to better the peoples lives don't think because we have different views we won't be able to listen and work with any party. Reconsider your votes and stop influencing other parties to work for you but you don't perform your duties. Evaristo Zhou All Progressive Party Senate Representative |
| Date | 11:05:52, March 11, 2016 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3996 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The All Progressive Party wishes to note that many political parties in Gaduridos are quick to dismiss its offer of service whenever it proposes it or is invited to partner in a coalition government. But its these same parties that if in power don't do anything for the term ending in elections which they heavily contest. Let us work when we are called upon, we are also here to better the peoples lives don't think because we have different views we won't be able to listen and work with any party. Reconsider your votes and stop influencing other parties to work for you but you don't perform your duties. Evaristo Zhou All Progressive Party Senate Representative |
| Date | 11:55:39, March 11, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3996 |
| Message | Mr Speaker We for once, concur with our colleagues in the Conservative Union. Pablo Gamez LSP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 338 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 412 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle |