We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Prisoner and Execution Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Beluzians
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2175
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Prisoner and Execution Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Prisoner and Execution Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:51:57, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Prisoner and Execution Treaty |
| Message | Support here. |
| Date | 03:08:01, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Prisoner and Execution Treaty |
| Message | Supported. |
| Date | 23:30:48, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Ratification of the Prisoner and Execution Treaty |
| Message | As always my main concern is not to do with the law or action in question, but rather the need to make this an 'international' treaty |
| Date | 02:49:54, January 23, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the Ratification of the Prisoner and Execution Treaty |
| Message | Well, just to clearify, though I think you already know this, another party made this treatry. We are just ratifying it to say that our country will follow it. |
| Date | 04:19:39, January 23, 2006 CET | From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Prisoner and Execution Treaty |
| Message | I withdraw support based on PAL reasoning. I thought it myself right after I made my initial post. |
| Date | 20:31:17, January 23, 2006 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Ratification of the Prisoner and Execution Treaty |
| Message | International law has no bearing on Beluzian policy making. If other countries have a particular problem with our policies they could resolve it with war or sanctions but this would almost certainly dent their reputation more than the original 'wayward' bill that we had created. If the international community wishes clarification of our domestic policy they need look no further that our national law. If we are in agreement with the outlines of the 'treaty' then so be it - what more do we need to do? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 19 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 49 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 32 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "The United States is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine." - George Washington |