We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gender Diversity Act, 3998
Details
Submitted by[?]: Homines Patriarchis / Frtogakai
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3999
Description[?]:
His Eminence, Patriarch Constantine of the East, Archbishop of Lerna and Primate of Pontesi, enjoins that the policy of the state be adjusted to respect the diversity between the male and female sexes. For the sake of sexual morality and morale in our armed forces, he enjoins in particular that women be removed from combat positions, as it is the man's role as observed by the Holy Apostle Thomas to exercise protection over his wife. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Proposed: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Women's working rights.
Old value:: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Current: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Proposed: Women are not allowed to perform potentially dangerous tasks.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:30:14, March 15, 2016 CET | From | Aurora Libertatis | To | Debating the Gender Diversity Act, 3998 |
Message | Mr Speaker, While biological differences between the sexes are a fact, we should be open to women preforming traditionally male jobs if able to do so based on the same qualifications as a man. This legislation would draw us closer to barbarian countries were women are treated as second-class citizens. The office of Duke or Duchess is certainly a potentially dangerous task, as are serving in the government. Is the "Patriarch's Men" suggesting that they would not rather see women be part of the government? Pandora Celesita Sucellus |
Date | 18:35:14, March 16, 2016 CET | From | Dashink’n Marzerum | To | Debating the Gender Diversity Act, 3998 |
Message | Mr Speaker, We strongly support this bill but wish to criticise both Articles for their dangerously liberal nature which maintains the unacceptable situation where little vixens prance around the military compounds tempting men and distracting them from training. Women in public places serves little more than outlets for temptations and are notoriously inefficient due to their emotion addled brains. They are naturally equipped to rear children not run government ministries or countries. If there is no rain this winter, you will know that it is because of Elyon's anger at this unnatural state of affairs with a wench at the helm of such an old nation.. Sarkis Darbinyan Chairman of the Alliance of Regions |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 79 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
Random quote: "A politician who is poor is a poor politician." - Carlos Hank Gonzalez |