We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Reforms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4001
Description[?]:
The pensions budget is overstretched due to the low retirement age, if we don't gradually increase it now, down the line the age will have to be dramatically increase. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 60
Current: 60
Proposed: 65
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:07:15, March 20, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Socialist Party | To | Debating the Retirement Reforms |
Message | Mr Speaker We cannot support these measures. Pensions should instead be handled privately to ensure this doesn't happen, we believe 65 is far too high. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 252 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 351 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 47 |
Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
Random quote: "Democracy is in peril." - Ralph Nader (referring to turnout in the 1996 US presidential election) |