Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 02:52:01
Server time: 01:07:58, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): DanivonX | Interstellar. | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the International Terran Bank - 4006

Details

Submitted by[?]: Great National Republican Guard

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4006

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the International Terran Bank. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:50:25, March 29, 2016 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Terran Bank - 4006
MessageMr. Speaker,

I stand firmly against this treaty. They offer no meaningful services, and we are content with the services offered by KFS.

--

Sid Landau,
Finance Minister

Date19:51:55, March 29, 2016 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Terran Bank - 4006
MessageMr. Speaker,

I also stand firmly against this treaty. My entire party will vote against it. We only set it to vote so that other parties could express their stances. We encourage our fellow MPs to join us in voting against this treaty.

--

Joshua Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG,
Minister of Trade & Industry,
Vice President of 2GDR Lodamun

Date07:38:43, March 30, 2016 CET
FromPro Lodamunese Unitarian Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Terran Bank - 4006
MessageAfter deliberation we have concluded that we see no reason why we need this, so we like many other party's, including the bills author, will vote against this.

Daniel Lodamun
PLUP's HOG Candidate

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
           

    Total Seats: 525

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

    Random quote: "If liberty and equality, as is thought by some are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in the government to the utmost." - Aristotle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 44