We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Justice Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Logarchic Philosophical Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 4006
Description[?]:
| Justice is of vital importance. Gone are the days when a single person may have the right to simply kill or spare someone on a whim. Hobrazia must advance in order to stay relevant in an ever-changing world. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to appeal against a judgement rendered by a court.
Old value:: All judgements are final and binding; appealing against them is not possible.
Current: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Proposed: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are no courts, the Head of State will determine what's right or wrong.
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There is a uniform system of courts across the nation.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change
The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and expels them from the country.
Current: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Proposed: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government provision of legal aid to the accused.
Old value:: Legal representation is never paid for by the state.
Current: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state.
Proposed: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state for defendants with low incomes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:02:28, March 31, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Justice Act |
| Message | Mr speaker, Why should the state pay in article 4? It is Beyond me but there are positive points so I shall vote in favour |
| Date | 12:19:06, March 31, 2016 CET | From | Logarchic Philosophical Front | To | Debating the Justice Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, It is unfair that people in low income families should have to fund their own legal support and suffer as a result of it. All people should be given equal representation in the legal system, regardless of financial situation. Hence, the government must support them, else their causes are swallowed up by the rich with their own agenda. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 505 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 145 |
| Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
| Random quote: "I have opinions of my own - strong opinions. But I don't always agree with them." - George W. Bush |