Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 01:16:19
Server time: 14:43:40, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | dannypk19 | HopesFor | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A Bill to Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sedarvan Economists' Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2175

Description[?]:

The Sedarvan Economists' Party recognizes that all individuals must possess certain rights in order to survive and in order to thrive. Therefore, the SEP would like to propose that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as defined by the United Nations of Earth in AD 1948. (www.un.org/Overview/rights.html ) be recognized by the Exalted Empire of Gaduridos as a list of worthy, respectable rights that must be given to its citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:34:07, January 23, 2006 CET
FromPost-Revolutionary Pragmatic Party
ToDebating the A Bill to Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
MessageWhich one?

Date02:29:41, January 23, 2006 CET
FromSedarvan Economists' Party
ToDebating the A Bill to Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
MessageThe one issued by the United Nations in 1948.

Date02:42:33, January 23, 2006 CET
FromPost-Revolutionary Pragmatic Party
ToDebating the A Bill to Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
MessageOOC: Yeah, I figured, but to nitpick, mixing real life and in-game events is sort-of not done... :p

Anyway, IC:

How do you reconcile this treaty with your party's libertarian beliefs? (In particular articles 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 29)

Date02:49:17, January 23, 2006 CET
FromSedarvan Economists' Party
ToDebating the A Bill to Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
MessageOOC: Ah my bad, I can take this off if you want then?

Date02:58:20, January 23, 2006 CET
FromPost-Revolutionary Pragmatic Party
ToDebating the A Bill to Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
MessageOOC: I don't particularly care, but maybe some of the more hardcore roleplayers might. :p

Date05:21:52, January 23, 2006 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the A Bill to Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
MessageWe do not agree with this due to articles 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 29.

Date09:28:12, January 23, 2006 CET
FromTraxian Imperial Party
ToDebating the A Bill to Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
MessageThere is an IC human rights treaty looked at it but we violate it so cannot sign :)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 111

no
     

Total Seats: 330

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information.

    Random quote: "I do not believe that the United States should be bound by the same rules as the smallest African nation. Life isn't like that." - Richard Perle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58