Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:52:28
Server time: 15:07:31, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Arusu-Weareback | HopesFor | Interstellar. | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Free People's Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of Liberty

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4013

Description[?]:

This bill to allow more civil freedoms for the people of Beluzia so that they do what they wish, so long that it does not hurt anyone or anything else. 'Each to their own' as we say, in the Party of Liberty. Freedom is a core tenet of Beluzia, and we need to ensure this.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:17:16, April 12, 2016 CET
FromNational Front
ToDebating the The Free People's Act
MessageThe National Front refuses to support this bill for the reason that by this logic we should allow rape. Rape is when sexual consent is not given, how can a animal give consent to a sexual act. This bill will openly encourage people to rape pets, RAPE. This bill is destructive as well as stupid.
Also Article 2, people in prison have committed a crime against society. So why should these people who have harmed society, be given the right to determine the direction of society .
Article 3 is just plain wrong. Acts of incest should always be followed up and acted upon where it results in pregnancy or not. This Article makes the Governments stance on the issue seem backward and contradictory, the article says that incest is still illegal so people should be prosecuted no matter if there is a pregnancy or not, the law still stands that it is illegal.
Article 5: The national front accepts the reasoning of this proposal however it is not thought through. In the wording of this article would allow media to openly, spy, kidnap and even torture public officials to get a story. This Article will lead to a serious breach of security within the Government and will lead to national security being put in second place to "getting a story". The priorities of the Party of Liberty needs to be refreshed.

Date22:35:41, April 12, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the The Free People's Act
MessageThe Party of Liberty understands the backlash by the National Front Party and would thus like to clarify some things - upon revision, we are now removing Article 1 as what is said by the National Front Party is correct and could lead to rape of animals and was not well thought through.

In Article 2, we now say that the point of Democracy is to give a voice to all - no matter their circumstances. Prisoners are still people no matter what they have done, and therefore should have a vote for what party they support. For a true democracy.

For your point on Article 3 we would like you to define 'wrong'. Is wrong being able to have the freedom to follow up on the love that you may have developed for family members, beyond unconditional? If it is, we believe that it the 'wrong' should be imbraced. It is not the governments choice to chose who the people love. It is the people's choice, and if they so happen to love a family member, then so be it. We are not any to judge. However, pregnancy can lead to birth defects and harm to the child, so this should be prosecuted. To each their own, we say. We are not any to judge.

As for Article 5, we do believe you are ignoring the rest of the law. This act does not condone kidnaping, torture etcetera. You also mis-judge the press themselves - they would not go that far for a story anyways, even if torture and kidnapping were somehow legal. Furthermore, government documents are safe and well kept. If they are leaked, it is the governments fault for not protecting them properly. The press is free, and shall not be regulated in anyway. Our priorities are in no need of refreshing.

Date22:51:01, April 12, 2016 CET
FromNational Front
ToDebating the The Free People's Act
MessageThe sexual act between brother and sister is utterly wrong and the National Front thinks that this bill would cause a spike in abortions in this nation. Not only this but how would the people accept this, the people of this nation know that this is wrong not only on biological level which incest has been proving to cause disease and serious illnesses. But also on a moral level, society can not and will not accept these people as being in a legitimate relationship in our society. This is wrong and needs to be removed NOW.

prisoners will earn the right to vote as a person when they have served their time and show real remorse for their wrong doing. Where is restrictions on this article that will stop prisoners voting for parties that will let them all free. The Liberty party is not interested in the justice system or the safety of society, all they want is to win over votes from the prisoners. And they are willing to see thousands of dangerous killers, robbers, child molesters and rapists turn our nations great cities in complete anarchy.

Date23:06:32, April 12, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the The Free People's Act
MessageFirst of all, there is no evidence of incest causing diseases without inbreeding. Contraception is available and will have to be used in these relationships. Second of all, it is not only the sexual act that we are allowing. It is the love between the two members that has gone beyond unconditional. If this love happens to develop, however unlikely, it should be allowed.

We would also like to remind you that not actively prosecuting people with a relationship will not increase the abortion rate. Family members do not actively look for relationships with eachother that goes beyond unconditional. This is just to allow such a relationship if on the very small chance it forms.

Everyone should have the right to vote once they get to adulthood, no matter their position in society in order to gain true democracy. You are exaggerating the voting base of criminals extremely. It is not enough to sway the vote completely. Furthermore, they are not running the country. They are simply voting - they may vote for you. Are they turning our nations great cities into anarchy by voting for the National Front Party? No, they are voting for a party. It is the same for the Social-Liberal Party, the Party of Liberty, the Republican Party or any other party. It makes no difference but gives them the rights they deserve.

Date23:07:28, April 12, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the The Free People's Act
MessageOOC: Just to say, these views aren't mine I'm just RPing them :P I don't actually believe incest should be allowed.

Date23:24:31, April 12, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the The Free People's Act
MessageOOC: Just to say, these views aren't mine I'm just RPing them :P I don't actually believe incest should be allowed.

Date03:10:45, April 13, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the The Free People's Act
MessageWe agree with Article 1,3,4 but not 2

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 123

no
     

Total Seats: 477

abstain
 

Total Seats: 150


Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73