We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Local Forestry Agencies
Details
Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4016
Description[?]:
The Neo-Democratic Party believes in the conservation of the environment of the Federal Union and the world at large. To ensure proper conservation, we believe local governments should be required to set up forestry agencies under their jurisdiction, to ensure a proper balance between business and conservation in their specific environments. This will allow businesses and the economy in general to still take advantage of the Federal Union's natural resources, facilitating growth and prosperity, while still being environmentally responsible. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 496 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 154 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Spamming", or the indiscriminate posting of unsolicited messages, is not allowed. |
Random quote: Time and again, the police prove themselves to be the Class Enemy, an armed mob used to oppress the masses and maintain the wealthy in their privileges. ~Friedrich Pfeiffer, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |