We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Restriction Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Independent Capitalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2175
Description[?]:
The government has no right to regulate employers in this area. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Proposed: Employers are free to fire workers who go on strike.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:56:45, January 24, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti-Restriction Bill |
Message | We agree with this as a postive step for business. |
Date | 23:15:57, January 24, 2006 CET | From | Fair Capitalism Party | To | Debating the Anti-Restriction Bill |
Message | It makes sense - why should they be forced to keep workers that want pay higher than what the demand dictates? |
Date | 13:22:41, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Restriction Bill |
Message | Because the market may not set prices at a humane level. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 318 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 282 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37 |
Random quote: "Since when did you care about women?" - Faith Chiang, former Gaduri politician |