We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Firing Strikers Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2176
Description[?]:
| A bill to make the government a neutral adjudicator in labour relations disputes. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Proposed: Government approval is needed before strikers can be fired.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:37:53, January 24, 2006 CET | From | Baltusian Pantian Alliance | To | Debating the Firing Strikers Act |
| Message | Labour unions inflict already to much with the employers ability to manage his own work force. |
| Date | 11:30:40, January 24, 2006 CET | From | Fatherland Party | To | Debating the Firing Strikers Act |
| Message | This is a good proposal even if it comes from Lib Libs |
| Date | 14:31:12, January 24, 2006 CET | From |  National Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Firing Strikers Act |
| Message | Certainly not. Trade disputes should occour between the employer and the employees, in order to determine a resolution which is suitable for all. Having the government involved adds a new element which is not required. |
| Date | 22:57:33, January 24, 2006 CET | From | National Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Firing Strikers Act |
| Message | ugh...sorry, misread the proposal. Support, in the interests of justice to the workers. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 203 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 46 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 112 |
| Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
| Random quote: "We had no domestic attacks under Bush." - Rudy Giuliani |