Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5461
Next month in: 03:30:19
Server time: 16:29:40, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of Liberty

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4021

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:39:59, April 28, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageLet me clear this up first - this is in no means any sort of attack or betrayal to the BPDP. We thought it was necessary to change the cabinet due to the BPDP's withdrawal from any matter to do with the Economy. Instead, the BPDP will be replaced by the BNRF. This coalition is to carry on the Economic Liberal coalition and make sure that we can drive the economy forward - the right way.

Again, this is simply because of the BPDP's withdrawal from the economic side of politics. We still very much respect the party, however this coalition cannot go on with a party that will not vote on economics.

We would also like to mention, like before, we are open for negotiation on positions.

Thank you.


Date21:46:24, April 28, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageThese are mostly the same positions as before, except with some slight changes.

Date22:00:59, April 28, 2016 CET
FromSLP-Libertarian Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageAm I the only one that finds it funny that fiscal conservatives are calling themselves liberal?

Date22:12:59, April 28, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageI suppose you are. Economic Liberalism the strong belief in the individual - any man can make his way to the top, and if he manages to do so he deserves to stay there. It supports a free market, which you do not. We are also Social Liberal.

Just because you bear the title of the 'Social Liberal Party' does not mean that you are the only liberal party.

Date22:14:23, April 28, 2016 CET
FromNational Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageThe National front looks forward to working with all parties not just those in this cabinet

Date22:21:01, April 28, 2016 CET
FromSLP-Libertarian Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageYou do know that is fiscal conservatism.

Date23:04:29, April 28, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageFiscal Conservatism and Economic Liberalism are VERY similar.

OOC: A quote off of Wikipedia -

"...but it is always based on strong support for a market economy and private property in the means of production. Although economic liberalism can also be supportive of government regulation to a certain degree, it tends to oppose government intervention in the free market when it inhibits free trade and open competition. However, economic liberalism may accept government intervention in order to remove private monopoly, as this is considered to limit the decision power of some individuals."

Date02:14:38, April 29, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageAs all budget debates have ended, we are willing to work, only if all the attacks on fiscal conservatism, economic liberalism end. If they don't, we will propose an alternate cabinet bill

Date02:16:23, April 29, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageAlso on the condition that all arguments with the SLP end

Date08:54:27, April 29, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageI'm afraid a demand such as that is impossible, friend. The SLP and the PL have astoundingly different views when it comes to the economy, and there will ALWAYS be arguments. They will always demonise the private sector - it is how things are.

We are putting this up to vote.

Date08:55:16, April 29, 2016 CET
FromParty of Liberty
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageOOC: i really hope the BNRF havn't done what all new parties have done in recent years xD

Date21:04:36, April 29, 2016 CET
FromBeluz National Freedom Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
MessageWe look forward to working with the other parties of the coalition to bring prosperity to Beluzia.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 403

no
   

Total Seats: 237

abstain
 

Total Seats: 110


Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

Random quote: "I'm the motherfucking Premier of Kalistan. It don't get more full time than that!" - Omar Al-Khali, former Kalistani politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73