We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party of Liberty
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4021
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the National Front
Article 2
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Republican Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Party of Liberty
Article 4
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Beluz National Freedom Union
Article 5
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Party of Liberty
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Republican Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the National Front
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Republican Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Beluz National Freedom Union
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the National Front
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Party of Liberty
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Beluz National Freedom Union
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Party of Liberty
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:39:59, April 28, 2016 CET | From | Party of Liberty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | Let me clear this up first - this is in no means any sort of attack or betrayal to the BPDP. We thought it was necessary to change the cabinet due to the BPDP's withdrawal from any matter to do with the Economy. Instead, the BPDP will be replaced by the BNRF. This coalition is to carry on the Economic Liberal coalition and make sure that we can drive the economy forward - the right way. Again, this is simply because of the BPDP's withdrawal from the economic side of politics. We still very much respect the party, however this coalition cannot go on with a party that will not vote on economics. We would also like to mention, like before, we are open for negotiation on positions. Thank you. |
Date | 21:46:24, April 28, 2016 CET | From | Party of Liberty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | These are mostly the same positions as before, except with some slight changes. |
Date | 22:00:59, April 28, 2016 CET | From | SLP-Libertarian Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | Am I the only one that finds it funny that fiscal conservatives are calling themselves liberal? |
Date | 22:12:59, April 28, 2016 CET | From | Party of Liberty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | I suppose you are. Economic Liberalism the strong belief in the individual - any man can make his way to the top, and if he manages to do so he deserves to stay there. It supports a free market, which you do not. We are also Social Liberal. Just because you bear the title of the 'Social Liberal Party' does not mean that you are the only liberal party. |
Date | 22:14:23, April 28, 2016 CET | From | National Front | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | The National front looks forward to working with all parties not just those in this cabinet |
Date | 22:21:01, April 28, 2016 CET | From | SLP-Libertarian Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | You do know that is fiscal conservatism. |
Date | 23:04:29, April 28, 2016 CET | From | Party of Liberty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | Fiscal Conservatism and Economic Liberalism are VERY similar. OOC: A quote off of Wikipedia - "...but it is always based on strong support for a market economy and private property in the means of production. Although economic liberalism can also be supportive of government regulation to a certain degree, it tends to oppose government intervention in the free market when it inhibits free trade and open competition. However, economic liberalism may accept government intervention in order to remove private monopoly, as this is considered to limit the decision power of some individuals." |
Date | 02:14:38, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | As all budget debates have ended, we are willing to work, only if all the attacks on fiscal conservatism, economic liberalism end. If they don't, we will propose an alternate cabinet bill |
Date | 02:16:23, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | Also on the condition that all arguments with the SLP end |
Date | 08:54:27, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Party of Liberty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | I'm afraid a demand such as that is impossible, friend. The SLP and the PL have astoundingly different views when it comes to the economy, and there will ALWAYS be arguments. They will always demonise the private sector - it is how things are. We are putting this up to vote. |
Date | 08:55:16, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Party of Liberty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | OOC: i really hope the BNRF havn't done what all new parties have done in recent years xD |
Date | 21:04:36, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Beluz National Freedom Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4020 - Economic Liberal Coalition 2.0 |
Message | We look forward to working with the other parties of the coalition to bring prosperity to Beluzia. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 403 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 237 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 110 |
Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
Random quote: "I'm the motherfucking Premier of Kalistan. It don't get more full time than that!" - Omar Al-Khali, former Kalistani politician |