We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Renew
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4021
Description[?]:
| A Bill to reinstate a strong and able military force |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation can only use chemical or biological weapons on non-civilan areas.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Article 4
Withdraw from the The Comprehensive Gay Rights Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:58:42, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Renew | To | Debating the Military Reform |
| Message | We are open to honest debate on the issue and we will provide amble explanation on any proposal Juan Horedos, MP candidate and parliamentary floor leader |
| Date | 01:20:04, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Green Party | To | Debating the Military Reform |
| Message | Dear Leaders of the SCP, The Socialist Green Party believes that the current law that represents biological and chemical warfare is perfect right now. Why do you think our nation should develop, construct and store these weapons of mass destruction and use them on non-civilian areas? Also, I am highly against withdrawing from the The Comprehensive Gay Rights Treaty and restricting women from serving alongside with men. If you remove those two proposals from your bill and explain your reasoning of why our nation should develop, construct and store these weapons of mass destruction and use them on non-civilian areas, then the Socialist Green Party may vote in your favor. José de Goya, Secretary of Defense and AugustÃn de Santa Anna, President, Socialist Green Party |
| Date | 01:39:59, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Classical Liberal Party | To | Debating the Military Reform |
| Message | We agree with the Socialist Green Party and request the same information. Samuel Brunetti Head Party Representative in Federal Senate, NDP |
| Date | 01:47:03, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Renew | To | Debating the Military Reform |
| Message | Leaders of the Socialist Green Party, The SCP believes that we should not limit our nations creation of these weapons without a international treaty to ban such weapons this will ensure that we can protect our self with these weapons while also discouraging other countries with these weapons from assaulting us in fear of retaliation. We acknowledge that in regards to woman in combat we are on 2 very distant platforms however we are willing to remove this provision if we have your support on the withdrawal from the treaty it is our firm belief that social issues should be able to be discussed, debated and voted on here not decided on by other nations, we understand your support of its policies but ask that the members of parliament and the country have a choice on the matter not be bound to a treaty Juan Horedos, MP candidate and parliamentary floor leader for the SCP |
| Date | 02:26:50, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Classical Liberal Party | To | Debating the Military Reform |
| Message | The Neo-Democratic Party does not believe in partaking in the arms build up of dirty bombs. In regards to withdrawing from the treaty, we believe that if public opinion were to change and the laws to change domestically, then there would be grounds to remove ourselves from the treaty. Samuel Brunetti Head Party Representative in Federal Senate, NDP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 194 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 329 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door. That's the only difference." - Ralph Nader |