We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill of morals and rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Right
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4029
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Remuneration of ministers of religion.
Old value:: The salaries and pensions of ministers of religions shall be regulated by the law, but shall be borne by the religious communities themselves.
Current: The salaries and pensions of ministers of religion shall be borne by the state and regulated by the law.
Proposed: The state does not intervene in the remuneration of ministers of religion.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Current: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Proposed: All schools are required to be religious in nature.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:49:11, May 16, 2016 CET | From | Freeborn Luthorians/Freeborn Coalition | To | Debating the Bill of morals and rights |
Message | "Mr. Speaker" "EXPLAIN YOURSELVES CR! You have not place, education is education and chruch is chruch, merging the two is backwards! As well why should Ministers of the Chruch get paid NOTHING? Number 1 will lead to the ecological downfall of our empire!" James Hustom LPU leader |
Date | 19:00:41, May 16, 2016 CET | From | Democratic Luthori Party | To | Debating the Bill of morals and rights |
Message | Mr speaker, W support article 1 and 2, but article 3 is the real reason we will vote no. The DLP believes that school children should be allowed to have their own opinion on religion and also be shown the other theories of reality, if all schools are religious only one side of the argument is shown. This will lead our children to be closed minded etc. So as a party we will be opposing this bill and voting no. Thank you. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 45 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 342 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 217 |
Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
Random quote: "The trouble with unemployment is that the minute you wake up in the morning you're on the job." - Slappy White |