We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Infrastructure Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alleanza di Centro Democratico
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4036
Description[?]:
A diverse series of policy shifts that reduce unnecessary regulation while maintaining an important role for the public sector. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: The government determines compensation for victims of eminent domain.
Current: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Proposed: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Funding of public transport (where applicable).
Old value:: Public transport is fully subsidised by the government.
Current: Public transport is fully user-pays.
Proposed: Public transport is fully subsidised for people with low-income, with the remainder "user-pays".
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Current: Private power stations provide energy for the entire power grid.
Proposed: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:13:28, May 27, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act |
Message | we agree on all the points with the Alleance excluding the Article 2. We can not take a step back on environmental protection, especially on a real pride for Italy, a nation with only environmentally friendly transports. And on the Article 1, we demand the formulation of a Law to ensure that the aforementioned neutral body is an organ within the State Judiciary. |
Date | 20:02:39, May 27, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act |
Message | Istalia* (sorry) |
Date | 14:59:47, May 28, 2016 CET | From | Partito della Rivoluzione Istaliana | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act |
Message | We would also like the car article to be removed from the bill. We will vote against regardless, but since the centrist parties make up the majority, we ask them to act responsibly with regards to the environment. |
Date | 18:07:34, May 28, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza di Centro Democratico | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act |
Message | While we support Article 2 as a means of lowering costs for consumers and expanding international trade, we have removed it from the present legislation. [OOC: Regarding Article 1, there is no in-game option that allows for specific wording regarding what the independent body may be, but we can presume that your amendment was adopted from an RP standpoint] |
Date | 21:09:00, May 28, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reform Act |
Message | We congratulate the government to sees it open to dialogue and compromise. It has earned the support of the PSL for this bill. For the amendment of the Article 1 we noticed that the game does not provide this specification and yes, our amendment was adopted from an RP standpoint. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 350 | ||
no | Total Seats: 280 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365 |
Random quote: "The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much trouble to put makeup on two faces." - Maureen Murphy |