We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Park Service Organic Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4039
Description[?]:
The Neo-Democratic Party believes that a strong commitment to a better environment is essential to maintaining national security. We advocate for a national park service to administer the national parks and ensure the ecological well-being of the Federal Union. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:10:08, June 03, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the National Park Service Organic Act |
Message | Im just going with the Majority Pljs i agree with These |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 750 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property." - Karl Marx |