Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5474
Next month in: 02:35:36
Server time: 21:24:23, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): GLNBei | Mity1 | SocDemDundorfian | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Abolition of Religous Oppression

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Renew

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4044

Description[?]:

Religious institutions should not be taxed

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:12:11, June 13, 2016 CET
FromGreen Moderates Party
ToDebating the Abolition of Religous Oppression
MessageWe oppose this bill. We believe that it is in the better interest of society that institutions not be granted preferential treatment through the tax code. Sports associations, religious organizations, and even social "betterment" groups operating as charities may take advantage of such a status in order to shield activities and monies from full transparency or accountability.

We believe that taxing profits and allowing for charitable donations not to be taxed is already a generous position for the religious organizations. They should not be registering any profit at all, as a social group. And all donations are not counted as income anyway.

Date21:14:24, June 13, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Abolition of Religous Oppression
MessageWe fully agree with the Green Moderates Party and oppose this bill.

Date23:35:29, June 13, 2016 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Abolition of Religous Oppression
MessageThe Neoconservative Party believes that our country's current policy is a good middle ground on the issue of taxation of religious institutions, and we will not be supporting any changes to it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 165

no
    

Total Seats: 585

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature.

    Random quote: "'The illusion of Pontesi nationhood'. The Serpent speaks. How can they say these things? How can they call our country an illusion? You can see it clear as day, these people won’t stop until they’ve destroyed us all." - Morgan Einar, former Pontesian general

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54