Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 01:52:05
Server time: 14:07:54, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Paulo Nogueira | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4053

Description[?]:

The policy positions of the Neo-Democratic Party. Contact us if you have simar policy views so we may craft a bill.

John Paul
Chairman of the Neo-Democratic Party

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:37:15, July 02, 2016 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)
MessageWe support only Article 7.

Date06:24:33, July 03, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)
MessageThe platform is now complete. Let the NDP know if you share a similar policy position.

Date15:37:04, July 03, 2016 CET
FromBentaran National Democrats
ToDebating the Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)
MessageThough we have no seats, we still must abstain from voicing our opinion. There are far too many issues perhaps in smaller sub bills we could support certain things.

Date16:19:14, July 03, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)
MessageWhat policy positions do you support? The purpose of platforms is to lay out the party agenda for the term, and having the other parties pick out policy positions they support, so smaller and more specific bills can be crafted.

Date16:24:20, July 03, 2016 CET
FromBentaran National Democrats
ToDebating the Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)
MessageWe could see ourselves supporting Articles 3,6,18,19 and 25 and possibly 5 and 7.

Date18:32:22, July 03, 2016 CET
FromGreen Moderates Party
ToDebating the Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)
MessageWe posses mixed support for these articles...

Support: #1, #2, #3, #4, #9, #12, #13, #14, #19, #20, & #23.

Oppose: #5, #6, #7, #8, #11, #15, #16, #17, #18, #21, #22, #24, & #25.

Date21:18:58, July 03, 2016 CET
FromRevolutionary Communist Workers' Party
ToDebating the Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)
MessageWe would only support articles 5, 9, 14, 17, and 25.

Date21:44:43, July 03, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Neo-Democratic Party Platform (Sept. 4052 term)
MessageGMP, since together we hold a good deal of seats in Congress, we will begin drafting bills on our shared policy positions.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 111

no
  

Total Seats: 56

abstain
     

Total Seats: 233


Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself.

Random quote: "Up against the corporate government, voters find themselves asked to choose between look-alike candidates from two parties vying to see who takes the marching orders from their campaign paymasters and their future employers. The money of vested interest nullifies genuine voter choice and trust." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 189