We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Right
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4058
Description[?]:
| The minster of internal affairs on the advice of the Prime minister and the IDP will lay forward that the LPU leader miss Patty Genn is to be convicted of Crimes against the crown for the bill: Under Genn, a new form of Democracy. Be it enacted miss Genn will: Be banned from the diet for life. A fine of 10 000 LPD Lose all titles of nobility if she posses one. Signed, Anders Ygeman: Minister of Internal Affairs |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:25:30, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Right | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | OOC: A new form of monarchy* |
| Date | 00:48:37, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Alliance of Social Democrats | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, There's no constitutional basis for this. Even if the resolution passes, nothing will happen. Same with the resolution put forward by the LPU to begin with. This is a non issue. I yield. |
| Date | 00:52:55, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Imperial Democratic Party | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, A non issue? The leader of the LPU has proposed to replace our Emperor and the ruling dynasty with her own family. She is off her rocker as far as I am concerned. I yield |
| Date | 01:01:43, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Alliance of Social Democrats | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Perhaps the LPU is naive, and I would support a formal censure of the LPU issued by the Imperial Diet, but the Imperial Diet lacks the authority to ban one of its members for life. Similarly, the LPU's resolution was invalid to begin with, so largely a non issue. I understand the IDP's concerns, but we must not overreact. I yield. |
| Date | 01:34:53, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Freeborn Luthorians/Freeborn Coalition | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | "Mr. Speaker" "I propose a hypothetical form of government and the government loses their shit and proposes to ban me?! Also there so no ban on changing the constitution or the ruling family of it says a Monarchial! This isn't just!" Patty Genn Leader of the LPU and HM Loyal Opposition |
| Date | 01:37:43, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Freeborn Luthorians/Freeborn Coalition | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | *if it stays |
| Date | 02:30:03, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Freeborn Luthorians/Freeborn Coalition | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | (Okay that's it, if this passes I'm leaving Luthori, I'm so tucking tired of these types of things. I'm done; that it.) |
| Date | 09:52:56, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Falanges Party | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | CR you have our full support |
| Date | 12:27:26, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, we think that this resolution is ex-post facto as we are still debating about the Lèse-majesté amendment on the floor. This is unconstitutional. I yield. Harry McFarrow MP Leader of the Liberals |
| Date | 16:55:49, July 12, 2016 CET | From | Imperial Democratic Party | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, After reflection, I see that the LPU did not commit a crime and must abstain from voting at this point. What they did was legal and would have to be treated as a constitutional amendment. While I disagree with the proposal, it is allowable. I have proposed a Les Majeste amendment to help clarify this. I yield. |
| Date | 01:10:28, July 13, 2016 CET | From | National Party of Luthori | To | Debating the Crimes against the Crown: Patty Genn of the LPU |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Parliamentary privilege protects what the honourable member from the LPU was proposing here in the Diet. I yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 210 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 349 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 37 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "The honest politician is one who, when he is bought, stays bought." - Simon Cameron |