Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5471
Next month in: 01:49:47
Server time: 22:10:12, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): lulus | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Biological and Chemical Weaponry Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of the Democratic Revolution

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4064

Description[?]:

The Progressive Democrats feel that in a rapidly more dangerous world, Solentia will need biological and chemical weapons to be more safe at home.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:57:45, July 25, 2016 CET
FromRevolutionary Republican Party
ToDebating the Biological and Chemical Weaponry Bill
MessageChemical warfare is inhumane and unfair to all even our enemies.It is a sign of disrespect.If biological weapons were developed ,there is a chance of it breaking out and maybe affecting our beautiful nation.I say NO to chemical and biological warfare

Date13:45:22, July 25, 2016 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Confederation
ToDebating the Biological and Chemical Weaponry Bill
MessageThe Libertarian Socialist Confederation is shocked by so-called "progressives" disregarding the lives of innocent civilians.

Date07:41:32, July 26, 2016 CET
FromRoyal Socialist Front (RSF)
ToDebating the Biological and Chemical Weaponry Bill
MessageOur Nation Must be able to protect itself, Regardless of the cost. The Royalist Socialist Party Supports this.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 87

no
     

Total Seats: 663

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "The day is not far off when the economic problem will take the back seat where it belongs, and the arena of the heart and the head will be occupied or reoccupied, by our real problems, the problems of life and of human relations, of creation and behaviour and religion." - John Maynard Keynes

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59