We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal - The New Future Coalition
Details
Submitted by[?]: Regionalist Coalition
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4065
Description[?]:
| The New Future Coalition (http://i.imgur.com/7h7E4RI.jpg) |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Regionalist Coalition
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Stanton House
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Stanton House
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the The Milita and Freedom Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Regionalist Coalition
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the The Milita and Freedom Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Stanton House
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the The Milita and Freedom Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Socialist Working Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Regionalist Coalition
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Regionalist Coalition
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Socialist Working Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Socialist Working Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:16:13, July 27, 2016 CET | From | Regionalist Coalition | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal - The New Future Coalition |
| Message | Madam Speaker, I present before the Senate, a government for tomorrow’s world. Beluzia deserves the best government. A government that works for the many, not the few. A government that is open, not divisive. A government is that is strong, not thrown together without forethought. The New Future Coalition [http://i.imgur.com/7h7E4RI.jpg] will be that government. As the name suggests, we will deliver real change for Beluzia, as was requested overwhelmingly at the last election. The New Liberal Party, the Socialist Working Party, the Nationalist Party and Stanton House, will put aside differences for the good of the country, so we can all work together and build a newer, stronger, better Beluzia. Madam Speaker, the new Government! Catherine Oaksworth Leader of the New Liberal Party |
| Date | 12:00:03, July 27, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Working Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal - The New Future Coalition |
| Message | Madam Speaker, May I begin by congratulating President Rayworth on his election and Madam Oaksworthon her imminent nomination as Prime Minister. I would also congratulate my colleagues from the New Liberal Party, The Nationalist Party and the Beluzian's People Party on their success in gaining many seats. And finally I would like to thank the ordinary citizens that voted for us, helping us to win 104 seats! The Socialist Working Party was created by a movement of ordinary working people who were sick of the old politics, sick of being overlooked and sick of their vital services being sold off to the highest bidder. So far the SWP have introduced a bill now passed as law which nationalises our airports, we have modernised and nationalised our police service, we introduced bills to regulate and nationalise the financial sector to get rid of these "too big to fail" banks, with their immoral and often illegal practices. We also proposed for nuclear disarmament which was voted against. This is just the beginning and clearly there is much more work to be done. Now, I know the SWP being in this coalition will raise some eyebrows. After all, the New Liberal Party and the Nationalist Party are not our traditional allies how ever to any doubters I would say this: This is a real opportunity for our party to be part of the government and to instrument real social change and improve the lives of ordinary citizens. We will put our political differences aside and work with our colleagues for the good of the people and THAT is what democracy is about. And THAT, Madam Speaker, is why we votes yes. Mike Smith Leader of the Socialist Working Party |
| Date | 15:05:11, July 27, 2016 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal - The New Future Coalition |
| Message | We will support this cabinet proposal to the best of our ability, but only if they don't cause havoc like the Party of Liberty, Republican Party, National Front, Our Movement, Beluz National Freedom Union, who said they were fighting for the rights of the people and said they were liberals, but in the end, turned out to be annoying conservatives. If this government can propose libertarian, progressive and social liberal bills, then it will be fine for me. But if you propose ultra-conservative, social conservative or anything out of order with the nation, then we will propose a motion of no-confidence, but probably won't pass, unless a party in power opposes it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 384 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 198 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 168 |
| Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
| Random quote: "One day our descendants will think it incredible that we paid so much attention to things like the amount of melanin in our skin or the shape of our eyes or our gender instead of the unique identities of each of us as complex human beings." - Franklin Thomas |