Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 01:52:30
Server time: 02:07:29, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | Neo_kami | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the The Fair Elections Treaty

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Milita and Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 4067

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the The Fair Elections Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:28:31, July 29, 2016 CET
FromRegionalist Coalition
ToDebating the Ratification of the The Fair Elections Treaty
MessageMadam Speaker,

Though we commend the belief in free and fair elections, and we have been the proud backers of legislation that have strengthened the power of the people in our democracy, we cannot support ratification of this treaty due to Articles 5 and 7 of it.

The first of these needlessly prevents citizens from deciding how to run their local governments. It forces citizens to directly elect a mayor to preside over municipalities, preventing local communities from choosing how they want to elect their mayor, or even deciding if they even wish to place such powers in the hands of a single person. Many people in communities I have been to would prefer the council to carry out executive actions in municipalities, as one single mayor can't always represent the whole town or city.

Then Article 7 advocates giving some States more powers that others - a disgraceful suggestion at best. It violates the central principle of the Federal Republic - coequal union between the States. We cannot support such a measure.

Sen. Mary Billingdon
Internal Affairs Spokesperson, New Liberal Party

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 168

no
   

Total Seats: 399

abstain
 

Total Seats: 183


Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI).

Random quote: "One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." - Thomas B. Reed

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37