We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Polygamy Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party of the Democratic Revolution
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4068
Description[?]:
The Progressive Democrats are progressive on a lot of issues, but not polygamy. Polygamy is immoral. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Current: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Proposed: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:01:25, August 02, 2016 CET | From | Revolutionary Republican Party | To | Debating the Anti-Polygamy Bill |
Message | This stops the freedom of marriage.Im sure liebrals and conservatives on a common ground here.Say no to anti-polygamy |
Date | 14:36:54, August 02, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Socialist Confederation | To | Debating the Anti-Polygamy Bill |
Message | The Libertarian Socialist Confederation is saddened by so-called "progressives" calling polyamorous immoral. |
Date | 14:37:36, August 02, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Socialist Confederation | To | Debating the Anti-Polygamy Bill |
Message | (OOC: polyamory, rather) |
Date | 19:20:00, August 02, 2016 CET | From | Royal Socialist Front (RSF) | To | Debating the Anti-Polygamy Bill |
Message | People should have the right to have polygamy if they make that choice. Our party Votes no on this bill |
Date | 21:15:52, August 02, 2016 CET | From | Party of the Democratic Revolution | To | Debating the Anti-Polygamy Bill |
Message | This bill was proposed by our conservative wing of the party, yes it exists thanks to us being the only social Democratic Party on a wave of socialism a |
Date | 22:39:28, August 02, 2016 CET | From | Party of the Democratic Revolution | To | Debating the Anti-Polygamy Bill |
Message | And let's not forget the hypocrisy of Conservatice Socialists when they voted to keep ADULTERY as a capital offence yet votes for polygamous marriages |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 222 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 512 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 16 |
Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
Random quote: "The more you observe politics, the more you've got to admit that each party is worse than the other." - Will Rogers |